Some other have a look at gender variations in well-known lover functions: The consequences away from endorsing the traditional females intercourse part
Jost, J. T., and you may Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and you may subservient sex stereotypes: Consequences having certain and you may diffuse types of program excuse. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 88, 498–۵۰۹٫ doi: -.3.498
Kay, A good. C., Time, Meters. V., Zanna, M. P., and you may Nussbaum, A. D. (2013). The latest insidious (and you may ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 287–۲۹۱٫ doi: /j.jesp.
Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., and you may Fiske, S. T. (2012). New innuendo effect: Hearing the good however, inferring new negative. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 77–۸۵٫ doi: /j.jesp.
Kilianski, S. E., and you will Rudman, L. A. (1998). Looking they one another suggests: Manage lady agree regarding benevolent sexism? Sex Positions 39, 333–۳۵۲٫
Mae, L., and you will Carlston, D. Elizabeth. (2005). Hoist yourself petard: Whenever prejudiced remarks is actually accepted and you may backfire on audio system. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 240–۲۵۵٫ doi: /j.jesp.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and you can recovery off lexical memory: Proof to own facilitatory and you can inhibitory techniques. Memories Cogn. cuatro, 648–۶۵۴٫ doi: /bf03213230
Likeability of address
Scheifele, C., Ehrke, F., Viladot, M. An effective., Laar, C. V., and you will Steffens, Yards. C. (2020). Review might socio?structural assumptions out-of public term concept regarding intercourse perspective: Evidence from correlational training on women’s leaders. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 51, e1–e16.
Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A great., Salvatore, J., and you will Trawalter, S. (2005). Ironic effects of racial bias throughout the interracial affairs. Psychol. Sci. sixteen, 397–۴۰۲٫ doi: /j.0956-seven.x
Siy, J. O., and you may Cheryan, S. (2013). ادامه مطلب … →